翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Pacific Aviation Safety Office ・ Pacific Banana ・ Pacific barracuda ・ Pacific Basin Development Council ・ Pacific Basin Economic Council ・ Pacific Basin Shipping Limited ・ Pacific baza ・ Pacific Beach ・ Pacific Beach Club ・ Pacific Beach State Park ・ Pacific Beach, San Diego ・ Pacific Beach, Washington ・ Pacific Bearing Corp ・ Pacific Bell ・ Pacific Bell Directory ・ Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc. ・ Pacific Bell Wireless ・ Pacific Bible College ・ Pacific Bible College (Medford, Oregon) ・ Pacific Biodiversity Information Forum ・ Pacific Biological Laboratories ・ Pacific Biological Station ・ Pacific Biosciences ・ Pacific black duck ・ Pacific Blackout ・ Pacific blockade ・ Pacific Blue ・ Pacific Blue (TV series) ・ Pacific bluefin tuna ・ Pacific bonito Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc. ''Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc.'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that Pacific Bell d/b/a AT&T did not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act when it charged other Internet providers a high fee to buy space on its phone lines to deliver an Internet connection.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2008/2008_07_512 )〕 The court ruled that where there is no duty to deal at the wholesale level and no predatory pricing at the retail level, a firm is not required to price both of these services in a manner that preserves its rivals’ profit margins. This case was initiated by Internet service providers (ISP), alleging that incumbent telephone companies that owned infrastructure and facilities needed to provide digital subscriber line (DSL) service monopolized and attempted to monopolize regional DSL market. The ISP's claimed that the telephone companies accomplished this by squeezing the providers' profits by charging them high wholesale price for DSL transport and charging consumers low retail price for DSL Internet service. Ultimately, the court noted that this case as not moot, but that it was not clear that the providers had unequivocally abandoned their price-squeeze claims, and prudential concerns favored answering the question presented. == External links == * (Text of the decision ) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.